Exhibit 99.1
Texas
Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC and Subsidiaries
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
September
30, 2008
UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
Page No.
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2008
|
1
|
|
|
Notes to Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
2
|
Note
1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
|
2
|
Note
2. General Accounting Policies and Related
Matters
|
3
|
Note
3. Accounting for Unit-Based Awards
|
5
|
Note
4. Employee Benefit Plans
|
9
|
Note
5. Financial Instruments
|
10
|
Note
6. Inventories
|
14
|
Note
7. Property, Plant and Equipment
|
14
|
Note
8. Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
15
|
Note
9. Acquisitions
|
17
|
Note
10. Intangible Assets and Goodwill
|
21
|
Note
11. Debt Obligations
|
22
|
Note
12. Minority Interest
|
26
|
Note
13. Member’s Equity (Deficit)
|
27
|
Note
14. Business Segments
|
28
|
Note
15. Related Party Transactions
|
28
|
Note
16. Commitments and Contingencies
|
31
|
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
Accounts
receivable, trade (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$1,525)
|
|
|
1,715,504 |
|
Accounts
receivable, related parties
|
|
|
6,410 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
170,290 |
|
Other
|
|
|
78,541 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
1,970,809 |
|
Property, plant and equipment,
at cost (net of accumulated depreciation of
$651,936)
|
|
|
2,372,694 |
|
Equity
investments
|
|
|
1,191,377 |
|
Intangible
assets
|
|
|
214,370 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
106,404 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
129,980 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
5,985,634 |
|
LIABILITIES
AND MEMBER’S EQUITY
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
1,809,746 |
|
Accounts
payable, related parties
|
|
|
38,940 |
|
Accrued
interest
|
|
|
49,327 |
|
Other
accrued taxes
|
|
|
29,970 |
|
Other
|
|
|
50,608 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
1,978,591 |
|
Long-term
debt:
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
notes
|
|
|
1,714,463 |
|
Junior
subordinated notes
|
|
|
299,565 |
|
Other
long-term debt
|
|
|
324,717 |
|
Total
long-term debt
|
|
|
2,338,745 |
|
Other
liabilities and deferred credits
|
|
|
30,138 |
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
Minority
interest
|
|
|
1,789,205 |
|
Member’s
equity (deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
Member’s
equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(100,700 |
) |
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(50,345 |
) |
Total member’s equity
(deficit)
|
|
|
(151,045 |
) |
Total liabilities and member’s
equity (deficit)
|
|
$ |
5,985,634 |
|
See Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET
Except
as noted within the context of each footnote disclosure, the dollar amounts
presented in the tabular data within these footnote disclosures are stated in
thousands.
NOTE
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Organization
Texas
Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC (the “Company”), is a Delaware limited
liability company that owns a 2% general partner interest in TEPPCO
Partners, L.P. (“TEPPCO”) and acts as the managing general partner of
TEPPCO. We have no independent operations and no material assets
outside those of TEPPCO. TEPPCO, a Delaware limited partnership, is a
master limited partnership formed in March 1990, and its limited partner units
(“Units”) are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker
symbol “TPP.” TEPPCO operates through TE Products Pipeline Company,
LLC (“TE Products”), TCTM, L.P. (“TCTM”), TEPPCO Midstream Companies, LLC
(“TEPPCO Midstream”) and TEPPCO Marine Services, LLC (“TEPPCO Marine
Services”).
Our
membership interests are owned by Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. (“Enterprise GP
Holdings”), a publicly traded partnership controlled by Dan L.
Duncan. Enterprise GP Holdings is an affiliate of EPCO, Inc.
(“EPCO”), a privately held company also controlled by Dan L.
Duncan. Through May 6, 2007, our membership interests were owned by
DFI GP Holdings L.P. (“DFIGP”), an affiliate of EPCO which initially acquired
such interests in February 2005. On May 7, 2007, all of our
membership interests, together with 4,400,000 of TEPPCO’s Units and the
incentive distribution rights associated with our general partner interest in
TEPPCO, were sold by DFIGP to Enterprise GP Holdings for partnership interests
in Enterprise GP Holdings. Mr. Duncan and certain of his affiliates,
including DFIGP, Enterprise GP Holdings and Dan Duncan LLC, a privately held
company controlled by him, control us, TEPPCO and Enterprise Products Partners
L.P. (“Enterprise Products Partners”) and its affiliates, including Duncan
Energy Partners L.P. (“Duncan Energy Partners”). EPCO and its
affiliates and Enterprise GP Holdings are not liable for our obligations nor do
we assume or guarantee the obligations of such affiliates. We do not
receive financial assistance from or own interests in any other EPCO affiliates
other than our general partner interests in TEPPCO. Enterprise GP
Holdings, DFIGP and other entities controlled by Mr. Duncan own 16,950,130 of
TEPPCO’s Units. Our executive officers are employees of EPCO, and the
other personnel working on behalf of TEPPCO also are employees of
EPCO. Under an amended and restated administrative services agreement
(“ASA”), EPCO performs management, administrative and operating functions
required for us and our subsidiaries, and we reimburse EPCO for all direct and
indirect expenses that have been incurred in managing us and our
subsidiaries.
As used
in this Report, “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company” mean Texas Eastern Products
Pipeline Company, LLC, and where the context requires, include our subsidiaries
and their business and operations. References to the “Parent Company”
are intended to mean and include Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC,
in its individual capacity, and not on a consolidated basis as part of a common
control group with EPCO, Enterprise GP Holdings or TEPPCO and its
subsidiaries.
Basis
of Presentation
We own a 2% general partner interest in
TEPPCO, which conducts substantially all of our business. We have no
independent operations and no material assets outside those of
TEPPCO. The number of reconciling items between our consolidated
balance sheet and that of TEPPCO are few. The most significant
difference is that relating to minority interest ownership in our net assets by
the limited partners of TEPPCO, and the elimination of our investment in TEPPCO
with our underlying partner’s capital account in TEPPCO (see Note 12 for
additional information regarding minority interest ownership in our consolidated
subsidiaries).
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
The accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated balance sheet reflects all adjustments that are, in the opinion of
our management, of a normal and recurring nature and necessary for a fair
statement of our financial position as of September 30,
2008. Although we believe our disclosures are adequate to make the
information presented in our unaudited balance sheet not misleading, certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant
to those rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC” or “Commission”). Our unaudited September 30, 2008
balance sheet should be read in conjunction with our audited December 31, 2007
balance sheet filed on TEPPCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K on February 28, 2008
and TEPPCO’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007. In addition, this financial information should be read in
conjunction with TEPPCO’s Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2008. The Commission file number for TEPPCO’s public filings is
1-10403.
NOTE
2. GENERAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RELATED MATTERS
Business
Segments
We operate and report in four business
segments:
§
|
pipeline
transportation, marketing and storage of refined products, liquefied
petroleum gases (“LPGs”) and petrochemicals (“Downstream
Segment”);
|
§
|
gathering,
pipeline transportation, marketing and storage of crude oil and
distribution of lubrication oils and specialty chemicals (“Upstream
Segment”);
|
§
|
gathering
of natural gas, fractionation of natural gas liquids (“NGLs”) and pipeline
transportation of NGLs (“Midstream Segment”);
and
|
§
|
marine
transportation of refined products, crude oil, condensate, asphalt, heavy
fuel oil and other heated oil products via tow boats and tank barges
(“Marine Services Segment”).
|
Our
reportable segments offer different products and services and are managed
separately because each requires different business strategies (see Note
14).
Our interstate pipeline transportation
operations, including rates charged to customers, are subject to regulations
prescribed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”). We
refer to refined products, LPGs, petrochemicals, crude oil, lubrication oils and
specialty chemicals, NGLs, natural gas, asphalt, heavy fuel oil and other heated
oil products in this Report, collectively, as “petroleum products” or
“products.”
Consolidation
Policy
Our
consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our
majority-owned subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial or equity
interest, after the elimination of all intercompany accounts and
transactions. We evaluate our financial interests in companies to
determine if they represent variable interest entities where we are the primary
beneficiary. If such criteria are met, we consolidate the financial
statements of such businesses with those of our own.
If an investee is organized as a
limited partnership or limited liability company and maintains separate
ownership accounts, we account for our investment using the equity method if our
ownership interest is between 3% and 50% and we exercise significant influence
over the entity’s operating and financial policies. For all other
types of investments, we apply the equity method of accounting if our ownership
interest is between 20% and 50% and we exercise significant influence over the
entity’s operating and financial policies. In consolidation, we
eliminate our proportionate share of profits and losses from transactions with
equity method unconsolidated affiliates to the extent
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
such
amounts are material and remain on our balance sheet (or those of our equity
method investments) in inventory or similar accounts. Our investments
in Seaway Crude Pipeline Company (“Seaway”) and Centennial Pipeline LLC
(“Centennial”) are accounted for under the equity method of accounting, as we
own 50% ownership interests in these entities and have 50% equal management with
the other joint venture participants. Our investment in Texas
Offshore Port System is accounted for under the equity method of accounting, as
we own a 33% ownership interest in this entity and have equal voting rights with
the other joint venture participants. Our investment in Jonah Gas
Gathering Company (“Jonah”) is accounted for under the equity method of
accounting, as we have 50% equal management with the other participant, even
though we own an approximate 80% economic interest in the
partnership.
If our ownership interest in an entity
does not provide us with either control or significant influence over the
investee, we account for the investment using the cost method.
Environmental
Expenditures
We accrue
for environmental costs that relate to existing conditions caused by past
operations, including conditions with assets we have
acquired. Environmental costs include initial site surveys and
environmental studies of potentially contaminated sites, costs for remediation
and restoration of sites determined to be contaminated and ongoing monitoring
costs, as well as damages and other costs, when estimable. We monitor
the balance of accrued undiscounted environmental liabilities on a regular
basis. We record liabilities for environmental costs at a specific
site when our liability for such costs is probable and a reasonable estimate of
the associated costs can be made. Adjustments to initial estimates
are recorded, from time to time, to reflect changing circumstances and estimates
based upon additional information developed in subsequent
periods. Estimates of our ultimate liabilities associated with
environmental costs are particularly difficult to make with certainty due to the
number of variables involved, including the early stage of investigation at
certain sites, the lengthy time frames required to complete remediation
alternatives available and the evolving nature of environmental laws and
regulations. None of our estimated environmental remediation
liabilities are discounted to present value since the ultimate amount and timing
of cash payments for such liabilities are not readily
determinable. Expenditures to mitigate or prevent future
environmental contamination are capitalized.
At
September 30, 2008, our accrued liabilities for environmental remediation
projects totaled $7.1 million. These amounts were derived from a
range of reasonable estimates based upon studies and site
surveys. Unanticipated changes in circumstances and/or legal
requirements could result in expenses being incurred in future periods in
addition to an increase in actual cash required to remediate contamination for
which we are responsible.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with GAAP requires our management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Although we believe these estimates are
reasonable, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Recent
Accounting Developments
The following information summarizes
recently issued accounting guidance since those reported in our audited December
31, 2007 balance sheet filed on TEPPCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K on February
28, 2008 that will or may affect our future balance sheet.
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 161, Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an – amendment of FASB Statement No.
133. SFAS 161 changes the disclosure requirements
for financial instruments
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
and
hedging activities with the intent to provide users of financial statements with
an enhanced understanding of (i) how and why an entity uses financial
instruments, (ii) how financial instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, and its related interpretations and
(iii) how financial instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s
financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161
requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using
financial instruments, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and
gains and losses on financial instruments and disclosures about credit
risk-related contingent features in financial
instrument agreements. This statement has the same scope as SFAS
133, and accordingly applies to all entities. SFAS 161 is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. This
statement encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier
periods at initial adoption. SFAS 161 only affects disclosure
requirements; therefore, our adoption of this statement effective January 1,
2009 will not impact our financial position.
In February 2008, FSP SFAS No, 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157, was issued. FSP 157-2 defers the effective
date of SFAS 157, Fair Value
Measurements, to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and
interim periods within those fiscal years, for all nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at
fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least
annually). As allowed under FSP 157-2, we have not applied the
provisions of SFAS 157 to our nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at
fair value, which include certain assets and liabilities acquired in business
combinations. On January 1, 2008, we adopted the provisions of SFAS
157 that apply to financial assets and liabilities. See Note 5 for
these fair value disclosures. We do not expect any immediate impact
from adoption of the remaining portions of SFAS 157 on January 1,
2009.
In light of current market conditions,
the FASB has issued additional clarifying guidance regarding the implementation
of SFAS 157, particularly with respect to financial assets that do not trade in
active markets such as investments in joint ventures. This
clarifying guidance did not result in a change in our accounting, reporting or
impairment testing for such investments. We continue to monitor developments at
the FASB and SEC for new matters and guidance that may affect our valuation
processes.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No.
142-3, Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets (“FSP 142-3”), which amends the factors
that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to
determine the useful lives of recognized intangible asset under SFAS No.
142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. This change is intended to improve
consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under
SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair
value of such assets under SFAS 141(R) and other accounting
guidance. The requirement for determining useful lives must be
applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after January 1, 2009 and
the disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible
assets recognized as of, and subsequent to, January 1, 2009. We will
adopt the provisions of FSP 142-3 on January 1, 2009.
NOTE
3. ACCOUNTING FOR UNIT-BASED AWARDS
1999
Plan
The Texas Eastern Products Pipeline
Company, LLC 1999 Phantom Unit Retention Plan (“1999 Plan”) provides for the
issuance of phantom unit awards as incentives to key employees. In
April 2008, 13,000 phantom units vested resulting in a cash payment of $0.4
million. A total of 18,600 phantom units were outstanding under the
1999 Plan at September 30, 2008. These awards cliff vest as follows:
13,000 in April 2009 and 5,600 in January 2010. At September 30,
2008, we had an accrued liability balance of $0.5 million for compensation
related to the 1999 Plan.
2000
LTIP
The Texas Eastern Products Pipeline
Company, LLC 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan (“2000 LTIP”) provides key employees
incentives to achieve improvements in our financial performance. On
December 31, 2007, 8,400 phantom units vested and $0.5 million was paid out to
participants in the first quarter of 2008. At September 30, 2008, a
total of 11,300 phantom units were outstanding under the 2000 LTIP that cliff
vest on December 31,
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
2008 and
will be paid out to participants in 2009. At September 30, 2008, we
had an accrued liability balance of $0.3 million related to the 2000
LTIP.
2005
Phantom Unit Plan
The Texas Eastern Products Pipeline
Company, LLC 2005 Phantom Unit Plan (“2005 Phantom Unit Plan”) provides key
employees incentives to achieve improvements in our financial
performance. On December 31, 2007, 36,200 phantom units vested and
$1.6 million was paid out to participants in the first quarter of
2008. At September 30, 2008, a total of 36,600 phantom units were
outstanding under the 2005 Phantom Unit Plan that cliff vest on December 31,
2008 and will be paid out to participants in 2009. At September 30,
2008, we had an accrued liability balance of $0.8 million for compensation
related to the 2005 Phantom Unit Plan.
2006
LTIP
The EPCO, Inc. 2006 TPP Long-Term
Incentive Plan (“2006 LTIP”) provides for awards of TEPPCO Units and other
rights to our non-employee directors and to certain employees of EPCO and its
affiliates providing services to us. Awards granted under the 2006
LTIP may be in the form of restricted units, phantom units, unit options, unit
appreciation rights (“UARs”) and distribution equivalent rights. The
term “restricted unit” represents a time-vested unit under SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based
Payment. Such awards are non-vested until the required service
period expires. Subject to adjustment as provided in the 2006 LTIP,
awards with respect to up to an aggregate of 5,000,000 of TEPPCO’s Units may be
granted under the 2006 LTIP. We reimburse EPCO for the costs
allocable to 2006 LTIP awards made to employees who work in our
business. The 2006 LTIP is effective until December 8, 2016 or,
if earlier, the time which all available TEPPCO Units under the 2006 LTIP have
been delivered to participants or the time of termination of the 2006 LTIP by
EPCO or the Audit, Conflicts and Governance Committee of our Board of Directors
(“ACG Committee”). In May 2008, we granted 200,000 unit options and
95,900 restricted units to certain employees providing services directly to us
and 29,429 UARs to a non-executive member of our board of directors in
connection with his election to the board. After giving effect to
outstanding unit options and restricted units at September 30, 2008, and the
forfeiture of restricted units through September 30, 2008, a total of 4,487,700
additional TEPPCO Units could be issued under the 2006 LTIP in the
future.
Unit
Options
The information in the following table
presents unit option activity under the 2006 LTIP for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Strike
Price
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
of Units
|
|
|
(dollars/Unit)
|
|
|
Term
(in years)
|
|
Unit
Options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
(1)
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
$ |
45.35 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Granted during 2008
(2)
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
35.86 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Outstanding at September 30,
2008
|
|
|
355,000 |
|
|
$ |
40.00 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
|
Options
exercisable at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
2008
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
___________________________________
(1)
|
During
2008, previous unit option grants were amended. The expiration
dates of the 2007 awards were modified from May 22, 2017 to December 31,
2012.
|
(2)
|
The
total grant date fair value of these awards was $0.3 million based on the
following assumptions: (i) expected life of the option of 4.7
years; (ii) risk-free interest rate of 3.3%; (iii) expected distribution
yield on TEPPCO’s Units of 7.9%; (iv) estimated forfeiture rate of 17%;
and (v) expected Unit price volatility on TEPPCO’s Units of
18.7%.
|
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET – (Continued)
At September 30, 2008, total
unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested unit options granted under
the 2006 LTIP was an estimated $0.6 million. We expect to recognize
this cost over a weighted-average period of 3.2 years.
Restricted
Units
The following table summarizes
information regarding restricted units for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
Grant
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Date
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
of
Units
|
|
|
per
Unit (1)
|
|
Restricted Units at December 31,
2007
|
|
|
62,400 |
|
|
|
|
Granted during 2008
(2)
|
|
|
95,900 |
|
|
$ |
32.97 |
|
Forfeited during
2008
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
35.86 |
|
Restricted Units at September
30, 2008
|
|
|
157,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
____________________________
(1)
|
Determined
by dividing the aggregate grant date fair value of awards (including an
allowance for forfeitures) by the number of awards
issued.
|
(2)
|
Aggregate
grant date fair value of restricted unit awards issued during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 was $2.8 million based on grant date
market prices of TEPPCO’s Units ranging from $34.63 to $35.86 per TEPPCO
Unit and an estimated forfeiture rate of
17%.
|
None of the restricted units vested
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. At September 30,
2008, total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted units was $4.1
million, and these costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 3.05 years.
Phantom
Units
At September 30, 2008, a total of 1,647
phantom units were outstanding, which have been awarded under the 2006 LTIP to
non-executive members of our board of directors. Each phantom unit
will pay out in cash on April 30, 2011 or, if earlier, the date the director is
no longer serving on the board of directors, whether by voluntarily resignation
or otherwise. Each participant is also entitled to cash distributions
equal to the product of the number of phantom units granted to the participant
and the per TEPPCO Unit cash distribution that TEPPCO paid to its
unitholders. Phantom unit awards to non-executive directors are
accounted for similar to SFAS 123(R) liability awards.
UARs
At September 30, 2008, a total of
431,377 UARs were outstanding, which have been awarded under the 2006 LTIP to
non-executive members of our board of directors and to certain employees
providing services directly to us.
Non-Executive
Members of our Board of Directors. On June 20,
2008, 29,429 UARs were awarded under the 2006 LTIP at an exercise price of
$33.98 per TEPPCO Unit to a non-executive member of our board of directors in
connection with his election to the board. At September 30, 2008, a
total of 95,654 UARs, awarded to non-executive members of our board of directors
under the 2006 LTIP, were outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of
$41.82 per TEPPCO Unit. The UARs will be subject to five year cliff
vesting and will vest earlier if the director dies or is removed from, or not
re-elected or appointed to, the board of directors for reasons other than his
voluntary resignation or unwillingness to serve. When the UARs become
payable, the director will receive a payment in cash equal to the fair market
value of the TEPPCO Units subject to the UARs on the payment date
over
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET – (Continued)
the fair
market value of the TEPPCO Units subject to the UARs on the date of
grant. UARs awarded to non-executive directors are accounted for
similar to SFAS 123(R) liability awards.
Employees. At September 30,
2008, a total of 335,723 UARs, awarded under the 2006 LTIP to certain employees
providing services directly to us, were outstanding at an exercise price of
$45.35 per TEPPCO Unit. The UARs are subject to five year cliff
vesting and are subject to forfeiture. When the UARs become payable,
the awards will be redeemed in cash (or, in the sole discretion of the ACG
Committee, TEPPCO Units or a combination of cash and TEPPCO Units) equal to the
fair market value of the TEPPCO Units subject to the UARs on the payment date
over the fair market value of the TEPPCO Units subject to the UARs on the date
of grant. In addition, for each calendar quarter from the grant date
until the UARs become payable, each holder will receive a cash payment equal to
the product of (i) the per TEPPCO Unit cash distribution paid to its unitholders
during such calendar quarter less the quarterly distribution amount in effect at
the time of grant multiplied by (ii) the number of TEPPCO Units subject to the
UAR. UARs awarded to employees are accounted for as liability awards
under SFAS 123(R) since the current intent is to settle the awards in
cash.
Employee
Partnership
On September 4, 2008, EPCO formed a
Delaware limited partnership, TEPPCO Unit L.P. (the “Employee Partnership”), for
which it serves as the general partner, to serve as an incentive arrangement for
certain employees of EPCO providing services to us. EPCO Holdings,
Inc. (“EPCO Holdings”), an affiliate of EPCO, contributed approximately $7.0
million to the Employee Partnership as a capital contribution with respect to
its interest and was admitted as the Class A limited partner of the Employee
Partnership. The Employee Partnership purchased 241,380 Units
directly from TEPPCO in an unregistered transaction at the public offering price
concurrently with the closing of TEPPCO’s September 2008 equity offering (see
Note 12). Certain EPCO employees who perform services for us,
including the executive officers named in the Executive Compensation section of
TEPPCO’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, were issued Class B limited
partner interests and admitted as Class B limited partners of the Employee
Partnership without any capital contribution. The Class B limited
partner interests, which entitle the holder to participate in the appreciation
in value of TEPPCO’s Units, are equity-based compensatory awards designed to
incentivize officers and employees of EPCO who perform services for us to
enhance the long-term value of TEPPCO’s Units.
The Class B limited partner interests
in the Employee Partnership that are owned by EPCO employees are subject to
forfeiture if the participating employee’s employment with EPCO and its
affiliates is terminated prior to September 4, 2013, with the customary
exceptions for death, disability or certain retirements. The risk of
forfeiture associated with the Class B limited partner interests in the Employee
Partnership will also lapse upon certain change of control events.
Unless otherwise agreed to by EPCO, and
a majority in interest of the Class B limited partners of the Employee
Partnership , the Employee Partnership will terminate at the earlier of
September 4, 2013 (five years from the date of TEPPCO Unit L.P.’s agreement of
limited partnership) or a change in control of us, TEPPCO or
EPCO. Summarized below are certain material terms regarding quarterly
cash distributions by the Employee Partnership to its partners:
§
|
Distributions
of cash flow –
Each quarter, 100% of the cash distributions received by the
Employee Partnership from TEPPCO in that quarter will be distributed to
the Class A limited partner until the Class A limited partner has
received an amount equal to the Class A preferred return (as defined
below), and any excess distributions received by the Employee Partnership
distributed to the Class B limited partners. The
Class A preferred return equals the Class A capital base (as defined
below) multiplied by a floating rate determined by EPCO, in its sole
discretion, that will be no less than 4.5% and no greater than 5.725% per
annum. The Class A limited partner’s capital base equals
the amount of any other contributions of cash or cash equivalents made by
the Class A limited partner to
the
|
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
|
Employee
Partnership, plus any unpaid Class A preferred return from prior
periods, less any distributions made by the Employee Partnership of
proceeds from the sale of Units owned by the Employee Partnership (as
described below).
|
§
|
Liquidating
Distributions –
Upon liquidation of the Employee Partnership, Units having a fair
market value equal to the Class A limited partner capital base will
be distributed to EPCO Holdings, plus any accrued Class A preferred
return for the quarter in which liquidation occurs. Any
remaining Units will be distributed to the Class B limited
partners.
|
§
|
Sale
Proceeds – If the
Employee Partnership sells any Units that it beneficially owns, the sale
proceeds will be distributed to the Class A limited partner and the
Class B limited partners in the same manner as liquidating
distributions described above.
|
Compensation expense attributable to
these awards was based on the estimated grant date fair value of each
award. A portion of the fair value of these equity awards are
allocated to us under the ASA as a non-cash expense. We will not reimburse EPCO,
the Employee Partnership or any of their affiliates or partners, through the ASA
or otherwise, for any expenses related to the Employee Partnership, including
the $7.0 million contribution to the Employee Partnership or the purchase of the
unregistered Units by the Employee Partnership. The grant date fair
value of the Class B limited partnership interests in the Employee Partnership
was $2.1 million. This fair value was estimated using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model, which incorporates various assumptions
including (i) an expected life of the awards of five years, (ii) risk-free
interest rate of 2.87%, (iii) an expected distribution yield on TEPPCO’s Units
of 7.28%, and (iv) an expected Unit price volatility for TEPPCO’s Units of
16.42%. At September 30, 2008, there was an estimated $1.7 million of
unrecognized compensation cost related to the Employee
Partnership. We will recognize our share of these costs in accordance
with the ASA over a weighted average period of 4.93 years.
NOTE
4. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Retirement
Plan
The TEPPCO Retirement Cash Balance Plan
(“TEPPCO RCBP”) was a non-contributory, trustee-administered pension
plan. The benefit formula for all eligible employees was a cash
balance formula. Under a cash balance formula, a plan participant
accumulated a retirement benefit based upon pay credits and current interest
credits. The pay credits were based on a participant’s salary, age
and service. We used a December 31 measurement date for this
plan.
Effective May 31, 2005, participation
in the TEPPCO RCBP was frozen, and no new participants were eligible to be
covered by the plan after that date. Effective June 1, 2005, EPCO
adopted the TEPPCO RCBP for the benefit of its employees providing services to
us. Effective December 31, 2005, all plan benefits accrued were
frozen, participants received no additional pay credits after that date, and all
plan participants were 100% vested regardless of their years of
service. The TEPPCO RCBP plan was terminated effective December 31,
2005, and plan participants had the option to receive their benefits either
through a lump sum payment in 2006 or through an annuity. In April
2006, we received a determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service
(“IRS”) providing IRS approval of the plan termination. For those
plan participants who elected to receive an annuity, we purchased an annuity
contract from an insurance company in which the plan participants own the
annuity, absolving us of any future obligation to the participants.
As of December 31, 2007, all benefit
obligations to plan participants have been settled. During the first
quarter of 2008, the remaining balance of the TEPPCO RCBP was transferred to an
EPCO benefit plan.
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
EPCO
maintains defined contribution plans for the benefit of employees providing
services to us, and we reimburse EPCO for the cost of maintaining these plans in
accordance with the ASA (see Note 15 for additional information related to the
costs and expenses allocated to us for employee benefits).
NOTE
5. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
We are exposed to financial market
risks, including changes in commodity prices and interest rates. We
do not have foreign exchange risks. We may use financial instruments
(i.e., futures, forwards, swaps, options and other financial instruments with
similar characteristics) to mitigate the risks of certain identifiable and
anticipated transactions. In general, the type of risks we attempt to
hedge are those related to fair values of certain debt instruments and cash
flows resulting from changes in applicable interest rates or commodity
prices.
Interest
Rate Risk Hedging Program
Our interest rate exposure results from
variable and fixed interest rate borrowings under various debt
agreements. From time to time we utilize interest rate swaps and
similar arrangements to manage a portion of our interest rate exposure which
allows us to convert a portion of fixed rate debt into variable rate debt or a
portion of variable rate debt into fixed rate debt.
Fair Value Hedges –
Interest Rate Swaps
In January 2006, TEPPCO entered into
interest rate swap agreements with a total notional value of $200.0 million to
hedge its exposure to increases in the benchmark interest rate underlying its
variable rate revolving credit facility. Under the swap agreements,
TEPPCO paid a fixed rate of interest ranging from 4.67% to 4.695% and received a
floating rate based on the three-month U.S. Dollar LIBOR rate. At
December 31, 2007, the fair value of these interest rate swaps was an asset of
$0.3 million. These interest rate swaps expired in January
2008.
In October 2001, TE Products entered
into an interest rate swap agreement to hedge its exposure to changes in the
fair value of its fixed rate 7.51% Senior Notes due 2028. This swap agreement,
designated as a fair value hedge, had a notional value of $210.0 million and was
set to mature in January 2028 to match the principal and maturity of the TE
Products Senior Notes. In September 2007, TEPPCO terminated this swap
agreement, resulting in a loss of $1.2 million. This loss was
deferred as an adjustment to the carrying value of the 7.51% Senior Notes, and
approximately $0.2 million of the loss was amortized to interest expense in
2007, with the remaining $1.0 million recognized in interest expense in January
2008 at the time the 7.51% Senior Notes were redeemed (see Note
11).
During 2002, TEPPCO entered into
interest rate swap agreements, designated as fair value hedges, to hedge its
exposure to changes in the fair value of its fixed rate 7.625% Senior Notes due
2012. The swap agreements had a combined notional value of $500.0
million and were set to mature in 2012 to match the principal and maturity of
the underlying debt. These swap agreements were terminated in 2002
resulting in deferred gains of $44.9 million, which are being amortized using
the effective interest method as reductions to future interest expense over the
remaining term of the 7.625% Senior Notes. At September 30, 2008, the
unamortized balance of the deferred gains was $19.4 million. In the
event of early extinguishment of the 7.625% Senior Notes, any remaining
unamortized gains would be recognized in the statement of consolidated income at
the time of extinguishment.
Cash Flow Hedges – Treasury
Locks
At times, we may use treasury lock
financial instruments to hedge the underlying U.S. treasury rates related to
anticipated debt incurrence. Gains or losses on the termination of
such instruments are amortized to earnings using the effective interest method
over the estimated term of the underlying fixed-rate debt. Each of
TEPPCO’s
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET – (Continued)
treasury
lock transactions was designated as a cash flow hedge under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended and
interpreted.
In October 2006 and
February 2007, TEPPCO entered into treasury lock agreements, accounted for as
cash flow hedges, which extended through June 2007 for a notional value totaling
$300.0 million. In May 2007, these treasury locks were terminated
concurrent with the issuance of junior subordinated notes (see Note 11). The
termination of the treasury locks resulted in gains of $1.4 million, and these
gains were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. These
gains are being amortized using the effective interest method as reductions to
future interest expense over the term of the forecasted fixed rate interest
payments, which is ten years. Over the next twelve months, TEPPCO
expects to reclassify $0.1 million of accumulated other comprehensive income
that was generated by these treasury locks as a reduction to interest
expense. In the event of early extinguishment of the junior
subordinated notes, any remaining unamortized gains would be recognized in the
statement of consolidated income at the time of extinguishment.
In
2007, TEPPCO entered into treasury locks, accounted for as cash flow hedges,
which extended through January 31, 2008 for a notional value totaling $600.0
million. At December 31, 2007, the fair value of the treasury locks
was a liability of $25.3 million. In January 2008, these treasury
locks were extended through April 30, 2008. In March 2008, these
treasury locks were settled concurrently with the issuance of senior notes (see
Note 11). The settlement of the treasury locks resulted in losses of
$52.1 million, and these losses were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive
income. TEPPCO recognized approximately $3.6 million of this loss in
interest expense as a result of interest payments hedged under the treasury
locks not occurring as forecasted. The remaining losses are being
amortized using the effective interest method as increases to future interest
expense over the terms of the forecasted interest payments, which range from
five to ten years. Over the next twelve months, TEPPCO expects to
reclassify $5.7 million of accumulated other comprehensive loss that was
generated by these treasury locks as an increase to interest
expense. In the event of early extinguishment of these senior notes,
any remaining unamortized losses would be recognized in the statement of
consolidated income at the time of extinguishment.
Commodity
Risk Hedging Program
We seek to maintain a position that is
substantially balanced between crude oil purchases and related sales and future
delivery obligations. As part of our crude oil marketing business, we
enter into financial instruments such as swaps and other hedging
instruments. The purpose of such hedging activity is to either
balance our inventory position or to lock in a profit margin.
At September 30, 2008, TEPPCO had a
limited number of commodity financial instruments that were accounted for as
cash flow hedges. The majority of these contracts will expire during
2008, with the remainder expiring during 2009, and any amounts remaining in
accumulated other comprehensive income will be recorded in net income upon the
contract expiration. Gains and losses on these financial instruments
are offset against corresponding gains or losses of the hedged item and are
deferred through other comprehensive income, thus minimizing exposure to cash
flow risk. No ineffectiveness was recognized as of September 30,
2008. In addition, TEPPCO had some commodity financial instruments
that did not qualify for hedge accounting. These financial
instruments had a minimal impact on our earnings. The fair value of
the open positions at September 30, 2008 was a liability of $2.8
million.
Adoption
of SFAS 157 – Fair Value Measurements
On January 1, 2008, we adopted the
provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, that
apply to financial assets and liabilities. We will adopt the
provisions of SFAS 157 that apply to nonfinancial assets and liabilities on
January 1, 2009. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would
be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET – (Continued)
Our fair value estimates are based on
either (i) actual market data or (ii) assumptions that other market participants
would use in pricing an asset or liability. These assumptions include
estimates of risk. Recognized valuation techniques employ inputs such
as product prices, operating costs, discount factors and business growth
rates. These inputs may be either readily observable,
corroborated by market data, or generally unobservable. In developing
our estimates of fair value, we endeavor to utilize the best information
available and apply market-based data to the extent
possible. Accordingly, we utilize valuation techniques (such as the
market approach) that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use
of unobservable inputs.
SFAS 157 established a three-tier
hierarchy that classifies fair value amounts recognized or disclosed in the
financial statements based on the observability of inputs used to estimate such
fair values. The hierarchy considers fair value amounts based on
observable inputs (Levels 1 and 2) to be more reliable and predictable than
those based primarily on unobservable inputs (Level 3). At each balance sheet
reporting date, we categorize our financial assets and liabilities using this
hierarchy. The characteristics of fair value amounts classified
within each level of the SFAS 157 hierarchy are described as
follows:
§
|
Level
1 fair values are based on quoted prices, which are available in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the measurement
date. Active markets are defined as those in which transactions
for identical assets or liabilities occur in sufficient frequency so as to
provide pricing information on an ongoing basis (e.g., the NYSE or New
York Mercantile Exchange). Level 1 primarily consists of
financial assets and liabilities such as exchange-traded financial
instruments, publicly-traded equity securities and U.S. government
treasury securities.
|
§
|
Level
2 fair values are based on pricing inputs other than quoted prices in
active markets (as reflected in Level 1 fair values) and are either
directly or indirectly observable as of the measurement
date. Level 2 fair values include instruments that are valued
using financial models or other appropriate valuation
methodologies. Such financial models are primarily
industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including
quoted forward prices for commodities, time value of money, volatility
factors for stocks, and current market and contractual prices for the
underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic
measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable
in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be
derived from observable data, or are validated by inputs other than quoted
prices (e.g., interest rates and yield curves at commonly quoted
intervals). Level 2 includes non-exchange-traded instruments
such as over-the-counter forward contracts, options, and repurchase
agreements.
|
§
|
Level
3 fair values are based on unobservable inputs. Unobservable
inputs are used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs
are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is
little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the
measurement date. Unobservable inputs reflect the reporting
entity’s own ideas about the assumptions that market participants would
use in pricing an asset or liability (including assumptions about
risk). Unobservable inputs are based on the best information
available in the circumstances, which might include the reporting entity’s
internally-developed data. The reporting entity must not ignore
information about market participant assumptions that is reasonably
available without undue cost and effort. Level 3 inputs are
typically used in connection with internally developed valuation
methodologies where management makes its best estimate of an instrument’s
fair value. Level 3 generally includes specialized or unique
financial instruments that are tailored to meet a customer’s specific
needs.
|
The following table sets forth by level
within the fair value hierarchy our financial assets and liabilities measured on
a recurring basis at September 30, 2008. These financial assets and
liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input
that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of
the
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET – (Continued)
significance
of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may
affect the valuation of the fair value assets and liabilities and their
placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. At September 30,
2008, we had no Level 1 financial assets and liabilities.
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity financial
instruments
|
|
$ |
24,339 |
|
|
$ |
1,597 |
|
|
$ |
25,936 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
24,339 |
|
|
$ |
1,597 |
|
|
$ |
25,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity financial
instruments
|
|
$ |
28,694 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
28,752 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
28,694 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
28,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
financial assets, Level
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
The determination of fair values above
associated with our commodity financial instrument portfolios are developed
using available market information and appropriate valuation techniques in
accordance with SFAS 157.
The following table sets forth a
reconciliation of changes in the fair value of our net financial assets and
liabilities classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy:
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Commodity
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
|
Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
January 1,
2008
|
|
$ |
(394 |
) |
Total gains included in net
income
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
March 31,
2008
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
Total losses included in net
income
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
June 30,
2008
|
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
Total gains included in net
income
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
balance, September 30,
2008
|
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
NOTE
6. INVENTORIES
Inventories are valued at the lower of
cost (based on weighted average cost method) or market. The major
components of inventories were as follows:
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Crude
oil (1)
|
|
$ |
135,684 |
|
Refined
products and LPGs (2)
|
|
|
13,209 |
|
Lubrication
oils and specialty chemicals
|
|
|
11,631 |
|
Materials
and supplies
|
|
|
8,104 |
|
NGLs
|
|
|
1,662 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
170,290 |
|
_________________________________
(1)
|
$117.7
million of our crude oil inventory was subject to forward sales
contracts.
|
(2)
|
Refined
products and LPGs inventory is managed on a combined
basis.
|
NOTE
7. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Major categories of property, plant and
equipment at September 30, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful
Life
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
In
Years
|
|
2008
|
|
Plants
and pipelines
(1)
|
|
|
5-40(4)
|
|
$ |
1,872,107 |
|
Underground
and other storage facilities
(2)
|
|
|
5-40(5)
|
|
|
286,212 |
|
Transportation
equipment
(3)
|
|
|
5-10
|
|
|
10,245 |
|
Marine
vessels
|
|
|
20-30
|
|
|
445,341 |
|
Land
and right of
way
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,547 |
|
Construction
work in
progress
|
|
|
|
|
|
269,178 |
|
Total property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,024,630 |
|
Less accumulated
depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
651,936 |
|
Property, plant and equipment,
net
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,372,694 |
|
______________________________________________
(1)
|
Plants
and pipelines include refined products, LPGs, NGL, petrochemical, crude
oil and natural gas pipelines; terminal loading and unloading facilities;
office furniture and equipment; buildings, laboratory and shop equipment;
and related assets.
|
(2)
|
Underground
and other storage facilities include underground product storage caverns;
storage tanks; and other related
assets.
|
(3)
|
Transportation
equipment includes vehicles and similar assets used in our
operations.
|
(4)
|
The
estimated useful lives of major components of this category are as
follows: pipelines, 20-40 years (with some equipment at 5
years); terminal facilities, 10-40 years; office furniture and equipment,
5-10 years; buildings 20-40 years; and laboratory and shop equipment, 5-40
years.
|
(5)
|
The
estimated useful lives of major components of this category are as
follows: underground storage facilities, 20-40 years (with some
components at 5 years) and storage tanks, 20-30
years.
|
Asset
Retirement Obligations
Asset retirement obligations (“AROs”)
are legal obligations associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived
asset that results from its acquisition, construction, development or normal
operation or a combination of these factors. We have conditional AROs
related to the retirement of the Val Verde Gas Gathering Company, L.P. (“Val
Verde”) natural gas gathering system and to structural restoration work to be
completed on leased office space
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
that is
required upon our anticipated office lease termination. At September
30, 2008, we have a $1.4 million liability, which represents the fair values of
these conditional AROs. We assigned probabilities for settlement
dates and settlement methods for use in an expected present value measurement of
fair value and recorded conditional AROs.
The following table presents
information regarding our AROs:
ARO
liability balance, December 31,
2007
|
|
$ |
1,346 |
|
Liabilities
incurred
|
|
|
-- |
|
Liabilities
settled
|
|
|
-- |
|
Accretion
expense
|
|
|
95 |
|
ARO
liability balance, September 30,
2008
|
|
$ |
1,441 |
|
Property, plant and equipment at
September 30, 2008, includes $0.5 million of asset retirement costs capitalized
as an increase in the associated long-lived asset.
NOTE
8. INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES
We own interests in related businesses
that are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. These
investments are identified below by reporting business segment (see Note 14 for
a general discussion of our business segments). The following table
presents our investments in unconsolidated affiliates as of September 30,
2008:
|
|
Ownership
Percentage
|
|
Investments
in unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Downstream
Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Centennial
|
|
|
50.0%
|
|
$ |
73,616 |
|
Other
|
|
|
25.0%
|
|
|
369 |
|
Upstream
Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seaway
|
|
|
50.0%
|
|
|
193,819 |
|
Texas Offshore Port
System
|
|
|
33.3%
|
|
|
2,354 |
|
Midstream
Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonah
|
|
|
80.64%
|
|
|
921,219 |
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,191,377 |
|
On a quarterly basis, we monitor the
underlying business fundamentals of our investments in unconsolidated affiliates
and test such investments for impairment when impairment indicators are
present. As a result of our reviews for the third quarter 2008, no
impairment charges were required. We have the intent and ability to
hold these investments, which are integral to our operations.
Seaway
Through one of our indirect wholly
owned subsidiaries, we own a 50% ownership interest in Seaway. The
remaining 50% interest is owned by ConocoPhillips. We operate and
commercially manage the Seaway assets. Seaway owns pipelines and
terminals that carry imported, offshore and domestic onshore crude oil from a
marine terminal at Freeport, Texas, to Cushing, Oklahoma and from a marine
terminal at Texas City, Texas, to refineries in the Texas City and Houston,
Texas, areas. Seaway also has a connection to our South Texas system
that allows it to receive both onshore and offshore domestic crude oil in the
Texas Gulf Coast area for delivery to Cushing. The Seaway Crude
Pipeline Company Partnership Agreement provides for varying participation ratios
throughout the life
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
of
Seaway. Our sharing ratio (including the amount of distributions we
receive) of Seaway for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was 40% of
revenue and expense (and distributions) and will remain at that level in the
future. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we received
distributions from Seaway of $7.4 million. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2008, we did not invest any funds in Seaway.
Texas
Offshore Port System
In August 2008, we, together with
Enterprise Products Partners and Oiltanking Holding Americas, Inc.
(“Oiltanking”) announced the formation of a joint venture to design, construct,
operate and own a new Texas offshore crude oil port and pipeline system to
facilitate delivery of waterborne crude oil to refining centers located along
the upper Texas Gulf Coast. The joint venture’s primary
project, referred to as “TOPS”, includes (i) an offshore port (which will be
located approximately 36 miles from Freeport, Texas), (ii) an onshore
storage facility with approximately 3.9 million barrels of total crude oil
storage capacity, and (iii) an 85-mile pipeline system that will have the
capacity to deliver up to 1.8 million barrels per day of crude oil, that
will extend from the offshore port to a Texas City, Texas storage
facility. TOPS is expected to begin service as early as the fourth
quarter of 2010. The joint venture’s second and complementary
project, referred to as the Port Arthur Crude Oil Express (“PACE”) will
transport crude oil from Texas City, including crude oil from TOPS, and will
consist of a 75-mile pipeline and 1.2 million barrels of crude oil storage
capacity in the Port Arthur, Texas area. PACE is expected to begin
service as early as the third quarter of 2010. Development of the
TOPS and PACE projects is supported by long-term contracts with affiliates of
Motiva Enterprises, LLC and Exxon Mobil Corporation, which have committed a
combined 725,000 barrels per day of crude oil to the projects.
We, Enterprise Products Partners and
Oiltanking each own, through our respective subsidiaries, a one-third interest
in the joint venture. A subsidiary of Enterprise Products Partners
acts as operator and construction manager and will act as operator. The
aggregate cost of the TOPS and PACE projects is expected to be approximately
$1.8 billion (excluding capitalized interest), with the majority of such
capital expenditures occurring in 2009 and 2010. TEPPCO and an
affiliate of Enterprise Products Partners have each guaranteed up to
approximately $700.0 million of the capital contribution obligations of
their respective subsidiary partners in the joint venture. At
September 30, 2008, we have a payable of $2.3 million for our investment in the
joint venture, which will be paid during the fourth quarter of
2008.
Centennial
TE Products owns a 50% ownership
interest in Centennial, and Marathon Petroleum Company LLC (“Marathon”) owns the
remaining 50% interest. Centennial owns an interstate refined petroleum products
pipeline extending from the upper Texas Gulf Coast to central
Illinois. Marathon operates the mainline Centennial pipeline, and TE
Products operates the Beaumont origination point and the Creal Springs
terminal. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we did not
invest any funds in Centennial. TE Products has received no cash distributions
from Centennial since its formation.
Jonah
Enterprise Products Partners, through
its affiliate, Enterprise Gas Processing, LLC, is our joint venture partner in
Jonah, the partnership through which we have owned our interest in the system
serving the Jonah and Pinedale fields in the greater Green River Basin in
southwestern Wyoming. The joint venture is governed by a management
committee comprised of two representatives approved by Enterprise Products
Partners and two representatives approved by us, each with equal voting
power. Enterprise Products Partners serves as operator. In
June 2008, Jonah completed the Phase V expansion, which increased the combined
system capacity of the Jonah and Pinedale fields from 1.5 billion cubic feet
(“Bcf”) per day to 2.35 Bcf per day. The expansion is expected to
significantly reduce system operating pressures, which is anticipated to lead to
increased production rates and ultimate reserve
recoveries. Enterprise Products Partners managed the Phase V
construction project.
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
From August 1, 2006 through July 2007, we and Enterprise Products Partners
equally shared the costs of the Phase V expansion, and Enterprise Products
Partners shared in the incremental cash flow resulting from the operation of
those new facilities. During August 2007, with the completion of the
first portion of the expansion, we and Enterprise Products Partners began
sharing joint venture cash distributions and earnings based on a formula that
takes into account the capital contributions of the parties, including
expenditures by us prior to the expansion. Based on this formula in
the partnership agreement, beginning in August 2007, our ownership interest in
Jonah was approximately 80.64%, and Enterprise Products Partners’ ownership
interest in Jonah was approximately 19.36%. Amounts exceeding an
agreed upon base cost estimate of $415.2 million were shared 19.36% by
Enterprise Products Partners and 80.64% by us. Our ownership interest
in Jonah is currently anticipated to remain at 80.64%. Through
September 30, 2008, we have reimbursed Enterprise Products Partners $303.9
million ($42.3 million in 2008, $152.2 million in 2007 and $109.4 million in
2006) for our share of the Phase V cost incurred by it (including its cost of
capital incurred prior to the formation of the joint venture of $1.3
million). At September 30, 2008, we had a payable to Enterprise
Products Partners for costs incurred of $1.3 million.
In early 2008, Jonah began an expansion
of the portion of its system serving the Pinedale field, which is expected to
increase the combined system capacity of the Jonah and Pinedale fields from 2.35
Bcf per day to approximately 2.55 Bcf per day. This project will
include an additional 17,000 horsepower of compression at the Paradise and Bird
Canyon stations in Sublette County, Wyoming and involve construction of
approximately 52 miles of 30-inch and 24-inch diameter
pipelines. This expansion is expected to be completed in phases, with
final completion expected in early 2009. The total anticipated cost
of this system expansion is expected to be approximately $125.0
million. Our share of the costs of the construction is expected to be
80.64%, and Enterprise Products Partners’ share is expected to be
19.36%. Enterprise Products Partners is managing this construction
project.
During the nine months ended September
30, 2008, we received distributions from Jonah of $111.6
million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we invested
$94.9 million in Jonah.
Summarized combined balance sheet
information by reporting segment as of September 30, 2008, is presented
below:
|
|
September
30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
Noncurrent
Assets
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
Long-term
Debt
|
|
|
Noncurrent
Liabilities
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Downstream
Segment
|
|
$ |
16,394 |
|
|
$ |
241,707 |
|
|
$ |
21,806 |
|
|
$ |
122,350 |
|
|
$ |
1,748 |
|
|
$ |
112,197 |
|
Upstream
Segment
|
|
|
43,791 |
|
|
|
255,412 |
|
|
|
14,015 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
285,164 |
|
Midstream
Segment
|
|
|
54,896 |
|
|
|
1,144,252 |
|
|
|
54,538 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
1,144,336 |
|
NOTE
9. ACQUISITIONS
Cenac
On February 1, 2008, we, through our
subsidiary, TEPPCO Marine Services, entered the marine transportation business
for refined products, crude oil and condensate. We acquired
transportation assets and certain intangible assets that comprised the marine
transportation business of Cenac Towing Co., Inc. (“Cenac Towing”), Cenac
Offshore, L.L.C. and Mr. Arlen B. Cenac, Jr., the sole owner of Cenac Towing
Co., Inc. and Cenac Offshore, L.L.C. (collectively, “Cenac”). The
aggregate value of total consideration we paid or issued to complete the Cenac
acquisition was $444.7 million, which consisted of $258.1 million in cash and
4,854,899 newly issued TEPPCO Units. Additionally, we assumed $63.2
million of Cenac’s long-term debt in this transaction. On February 1,
2008, we repaid the $63.2 million of assumed debt in full with borrowings under
TEPPCO’s term credit agreement (see Note 11).
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
The following table summarizes the
components of total consideration paid or issued in this
transaction.
Cash
payment for Cenac
acquisition
|
|
$ |
256,593 |
|
Fair
value of TEPPCO’s 4,854,899
Units
|
|
|
186,558 |
|
Other
cash acquisition costs paid to third-parties
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
Total
consideration
|
|
$ |
444,681 |
|
We
financed the cash portion of the consideration with borrowings under TEPPCO’s
term credit agreement (see Note 11). In accordance with purchase
accounting, the value of TEPPCO’s Units issued in connection with the Cenac
acquisition was based on the average closing price of such Units immediately
prior to and on the day of February 1, 2008. For the purpose of this
calculation, the average closing price was $38.43 per TEPPCO Unit.
We
acquired 42 tow boats, 89 tank barges and the economic benefit of certain
related commercial agreements. This business serves refineries and
storage terminals along the Mississippi, Illinois and Ohio rivers, and the
Intracoastal Waterway between Texas and Florida. These assets also
gather crude oil from production facilities and platforms along the U.S. Gulf
Coast and in the Gulf of Mexico. This acquisition is a natural
extension of our existing assets and complements two of our core franchise
businesses: the transportation and storage of refined products and
the gathering, transportation and storage of crude oil.
The
results of operations for the Cenac acquisition are included in our consolidated
financial statements beginning at the date of acquisition, in a newly created
business segment, Marine Services Segment. Our fleet of acquired tow
boats and tank barges will continue to be operated by employees of Cenac under a
transitional operating agreement with TEPPCO Marine Services for a period of up
to two years following the acquisition. These operations will remain
headquartered in Houma, Louisiana during such time.
The
purchase agreement gives us the right to repurchase the approximately 4.9
million TEPPCO Units issued in the transaction in connection with proposed sales
thereof by Cenac and specified related persons for 10 years. If we or
any of our affiliates sell any of the assets acquired from Cenac Towing prior to
June 30, 2018 and recognize certain “built-in gains” for federal income tax
purposes that are allocable to Cenac Towing, we have indemnification obligations
under the purchase agreement to pay Cenac Towing an amount generally intended to
compensate for the incremental level of double taxation imposed on Cenac Towing
as a result of the sale. The purchase agreement prohibits Cenac from
competing with our marine services business for two years or from soliciting
employees and service providers of TEPPCO Marine Services and its affiliates for
four years. The purchase agreement contains other customary
representations, warranties, covenants and indemnification
provisions.
This acquisition was accounted for
using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the cost has been
allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated
preliminary fair values. Such preliminary fair values have been
developed using recognized business valuation techniques and are subject to
change pending a final valuation analysis. We expect to finalize the
purchase price allocation for this transaction during 2008.
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
The
following table summarizes estimated fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition.
Property,
plant and
equipment
|
|
$ |
360,146 |
|
Intangible
assets
|
|
|
63,500 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
2,726 |
|
Total
assets
acquired
|
|
|
426,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt
|
|
|
(63,157 |
) |
Total
liabilities
assumed
|
|
|
(63,157 |
) |
Total
assets acquired less liabilities assumed
|
|
|
363,215 |
|
Total
consideration
given
|
|
|
444,681 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
$ |
81,466 |
|
The $63.5 million preliminary fair
value of acquired intangible assets represents customer relationships and
non-compete agreements. Customer relationship intangible assets
represent the estimated economic value attributable to certain relationships
acquired in connection with the Cenac acquisition whereby (i) we acquired
information about or access to customers and now have regular contact with them
and (ii) the customers now have the ability to make direct contact with
us. In this context, customer relationships arise from contractual
arrangements (such as transportation contracts) and through means other than
contracts, such as regular contact by sales or service
representative. The values assigned to these intangible assets are
amortized to earnings on a straight-line basis over the expected period of
economic benefit, which ranges from 2 to 20 years.
Of the $444.7 million in consideration
we paid or issued to complete the Cenac acquisition, $81.5 million has been
assigned to goodwill. Management attributes the value of this
goodwill to potential future benefits we expect to realize as a result of
acquiring these assets.
Horizon
On February 29, 2008, we expanded our
Marine Services Segment with the acquisition of marine assets from Horizon
Maritime, L.L.C. (“Horizon”), a privately-held Houston-based company and an
affiliate of Mr. Cenac for $80.8 million in cash. We acquired 7 tow
boats, 17 tank barges, rights to two tow boats under construction and certain
related commercial and other agreements (or the associated economic
benefits). In April 2008, we paid $3.0 million to Horizon pursuant to
the purchase agreement upon delivery of one of the tow boats under construction,
and in June 2008, we paid $3.8 million upon delivery of the second tow
boat. The acquired vessels transport asphalt, heavy fuel oil and
other heated oil products to storage facilities and refineries along the
Mississippi, Illinois and Ohio Rivers, and the Intracoastal
Waterway. We financed the acquisition with borrowings under TEPPCO’s
term credit agreement.
The results of operations for the
Horizon acquisition are included in our consolidated financial statements
beginning at the date of acquisition, in our Marine Services
Segment. This acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method
of accounting and, accordingly, the cost has been allocated to assets acquired
and liabilities assumed based on estimated preliminary fair
values. Such preliminary fair values have been developed using
recognized business valuation techniques and are subject to change pending a
final valuation analysis. We expect to finalize the purchase price
allocation for this transaction during 2008. The following table
summarizes estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
at the date of acquisition.
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
Property,
plant and
equipment
|
|
$ |
71,216 |
|
Intangible
assets
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
981 |
|
Total
assets
acquired
|
|
|
78,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
consideration
given
|
|
|
87,525 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
$ |
8,828 |
|
The $6.5 million preliminary fair value
of acquired intangible assets represents customer relationships and non-compete
agreements. Customer relationship intangible assets represent the
estimated economic value attributable to certain relationships acquired in
connection with the Horizon acquisition whereby (i) we acquired information
about or access to customers and now have regular contact with them and (ii) the
customers now have the ability to make direct contact with us. In
this context, customer relationships arise from contractual arrangements (such
as transportation contracts) and through means other than contracts, such as
regular contact by sales or service representative. The values
assigned to these intangible assets are amortized to earnings on a straight-line
basis over the expected period of economic benefit, which ranges from 2 to 9
years.
Of the $87.5 million in consideration
we paid to complete the acquisition of the Horizon business, $8.8 million has
been assigned to goodwill. Management attributes the value of this
goodwill to potential future benefits we expect to realize as a result of
acquiring these assets and further expanding our Marine Services
Segment.
Lubrication
and Other Fuel Oil Assets
On August 1, 2008, we purchased
lubrication and other fuel oil assets, located in Wyoming, from Quality
Petroleum, Inc. for approximately $7.5 million. The assets, included
in our Upstream Segment, consist of operating inventory, buildings, land and
various equipment and the assignment of certain distributor
agreements. We funded the purchase through borrowings under TEPPCO’s
revolving credit facility, and we allocated the purchase price primarily to
property, plant and equipment, goodwill, inventory and intangible
assets. We recorded $0.6 million of goodwill related to this
acquisition.
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
NOTE
10. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL
Intangible
Assets
The following table summarizes our
intangible assets, including excess investments, being amortized at September
30, 2008:
|
|
September
30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
Intangible
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Downstream
Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation
agreements
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
(395 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
5,244 |
|
|
|
(652 |
) |
Subtotal
|
|
|
6,244 |
|
|
|
(1,047 |
) |
Upstream Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation
agreements
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
(380 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
11,255 |
|
|
|
(3,492 |
) |
Subtotal
|
|
|
12,143 |
|
|
|
(3,872 |
) |
Midstream Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gathering
agreements
|
|
|
239,649 |
|
|
|
(121,574 |
) |
Fractionation
agreement
|
|
|
38,000 |
|
|
|
(19,950 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
Subtotal
|
|
|
277,955 |
|
|
|
(141,685 |
) |
Marine Services
Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationship
intangibles
|
|
|
51,320 |
|
|
|
(2,260 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
18,680 |
|
|
|
(3,108 |
) |
Subtotal
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
(5,368 |
) |
Total
intangible assets
|
|
|
366,342 |
|
|
|
(151,972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess
investments: (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Downstream Segment
(2)
|
|
|
33,390 |
|
|
|
(25,012 |
) |
Upstream Segment
(3)
|
|
|
26,908 |
|
|
|
(5,649 |
) |
Midstream Segment
(4)
|
|
|
7,469 |
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
Subtotal
|
|
|
67,767 |
|
|
|
(30,854 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
intangible assets, including
excess
investments
|
|
$ |
434,109 |
|
|
$ |
(182,826 |
) |
__________________________________________
(1)
|
Excess
investments are included in “Equity Investments” in our consolidated
balance sheet.
|
(2)
|
Relates
to our investment in Centennial.
|
(3)
|
Relates
to our investment in Seaway.
|
(4)
|
Relates
to our investment in Jonah.
|
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
Goodwill
The following table presents the
carrying amount of goodwill at September 30, 2008, by business
segment:
|
|
September
30,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Downstream Segment
|
|
$ |
1,339 |
|
Upstream Segment
|
|
|
14,771 |
|
Marine Services
Segment
|
|
|
90,294 |
|
Total
goodwill
|
|
$ |
106,404 |
|
NOTE
11. DEBT OBLIGATIONS
The
following table summarizes the principal amounts outstanding under all of
TEPPCO’s debt instruments at September 30, 2008:
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term:
|
|
|
|
Senior debt obligations:
(1)
|
|
|
|
Revolving
Credit Facility, due December 2012
|
|
$ |
324,717 |
|
7.625%
Senior Notes, due February 2012
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
6.125%
Senior Notes, due February 2013
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
5.90% Senior Notes,
due April 2013
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
6.65% Senior Notes,
due April 2018
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
7.55% Senior Notes,
due April 2038
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Total principal amount of
long-term senior debt obligations
|
|
|
2,024,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.000%
Junior Subordinated Notes, due June 2067 (1)
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Total principal
amount of long-term debt obligations
|
|
|
2,324,717 |
|
Adjustment to carrying value
associated with hedges of fair value and
unamortized
discounts (2)
|
|
|
14,028 |
|
Total
long-term debt obligations
|
|
|
2,338,745 |
|
Total
Debt Instruments (2)
|
|
$ |
2,338,745 |
|
_________________
(1)
|
TE
Products, TCTM, TEPPCO Midstream and Val Verde (collectively, the
“Subsidiary Guarantors”) have issued full, unconditional, joint and
several guarantees of TEPPCO’s senior notes, junior subordinated notes and
revolving credit facility.
|
(2)
|
From
time to time, TEPPCO enters into interest rate swap agreements to hedge
its exposure to changes in the fair value on a portion of the debt
obligations presented above (see Note 5). Amount includes $5.4
million of unamortized discounts and $19.4 million related to fair value
hedges.
|
Revolving
Credit Facility
TEPPCO has in place an unsecured
revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”), which matures on
December 12, 2012. The Revolving Credit Facility allows TEPPCO to
request unlimited one-year extensions of the maturity date, subject to lender
approval and satisfaction of certain other conditions. In July 2008,
TEPPCO received confirmations from participating lenders making effective its
exercise of the accordion feature under the facility, and increased the bank
commitments thereunder from $700.0 million to $950.0 million. The
aggregate
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
outstanding
principal amount of swing line loans or same day borrowings permitted under the
Revolving Credit Facility is $40.0 million. The interest rate is
based, at TEPPCO’s option, on either the lender’s base rate, or LIBOR rate, plus
a margin, in effect at the time of the borrowings. The applicable
margin with respect to LIBOR rate borrowings is based on TEPPCO’s senior
unsecured non-credit enhanced long-term debt rating issued by Standard &
Poor’s Rating Services (“S&P”) and Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
(“Moody’s”). The Revolving Credit Facility contains a term-out option
in which TEPPCO may, on the maturity date, convert the principal balance of all
revolving loans then outstanding into a non-revolving one-year term
loan. Upon the conversion of the revolving loans to term loans
pursuant to the term-out option, the applicable LIBOR spread will increase by
0.125% per year, and if immediately prior to such borrowing the total
outstanding revolver borrowings then outstanding exceeds 50% of the total lender
commitments, the applicable LIBOR spread with respect to borrowings will
increase by an additional 10 basis points.
During September 2008, Lehman Brothers
Bank, FSB (“Lehman”), which had a 4.05% participation in TEPPCO’s Revolving
Credit Facility, stopped funding its commitment following the bankruptcy filing
of its parent. Assuming that future fundings are not received for the
Lehman percentage commitment, aggregate available capacity would be reduced by
approximately $38.5 million.
The Revolving Credit Facility contains
financial covenants that require TEPPCO to maintain a ratio of Consolidated
Funded Debt to Pro Forma EBITDA (as defined and calculated in the facility) of
less than 5.00 to 1.00 (and, if after giving effect to a permitted acquisition
the ratio exceeds 5.00 to 1.00, the threshold ratio will be increased to 5.50 to
1.00 for the fiscal quarter in which such acquisition occurs and the first full
fiscal quarter following such acquisition). Other restrictive
covenants in the Revolving Credit Facility limit TEPPCO’s ability, and the
ability of certain of its subsidiaries, to, among other things, incur certain
additional indebtedness, make certain distributions, incur certain liens, engage
in specified transactions with affiliates and complete mergers, acquisitions and
sales of assets. The credit agreement restricts the amount of
outstanding debt of the Jonah joint venture to debt owing to the owners of its
partnership interests and other third-party debt in the aggregate principal
amount of $50.0 million and allows for the issuance of certain hybrid securities
of up to 15% of TEPPCO’s Consolidated Total Capitalization (as defined
therein). In September 2008, TEPPCO used proceeds from its equity
offering (see Note 12) to repay a portion of the then outstanding balance of the
Revolving Credit Facility. At September 30, 2008, $324.7 million was
outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility at a weighted average interest
rate of 3.56%, and available borrowing capacity under the facility was
approximately $600.0 million. At September 30, 2008, TEPPCO was in
compliance with the covenants of the Revolving Credit Facility.
Senior
Notes
On January 27, 1998, TE Products issued
$180.0 million principal amount of 6.45% Senior Notes due 2008 and $210.0
million principal amount of 7.51% Senior Notes due 2028 (collectively the “TE
Products Senior Notes”). Interest on the TE Products Senior Notes was
payable semiannually in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each
year. The 6.45% TE Products Senior Notes were issued at a discount of
$0.3 million and were being accreted to their face value over the term of the
notes. The 6.45% TE Products Senior Notes due 2008 were redeemed at
maturity on January 15, 2008. The 7.51% TE Products Senior Notes due
2028, issued at par, became redeemable at any time after January 15, 2008, at
the option of TE Products, in whole or in part, at varying fixed annual
redemption prices. In October 2007, TE Products repurchased $35.0
million principal amount of the 7.51% TE Products Senior Notes for $36.1 million
and accrued interest. On January 28, 2008, TE Products redeemed the
remaining $175.0 million of 7.51% TE Products Senior Notes at a redemption price
of 103.755% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest at the date
of redemption. TEPPCO funded the retirement of both series of senior
notes with borrowings under its term credit agreement.
On February 20, 2002 and January 30,
2003, TEPPCO issued $500.0 million principal amount of 7.625% Senior Notes due
2012 (“7.625% Senior Notes”) and $200.0 million principal amount of 6.125%
Senior Notes due 2013 (“6.125% Senior Notes”), respectively. The
7.625% Senior Notes and the 6.125% Senior Notes were issued at
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
discounts
of $2.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively, and are being accreted to their
face value over the applicable term of the senior notes. The senior
notes may be redeemed at any time at TEPPCO’s option with the payment of accrued
interest and a make-whole premium determined by discounting remaining interest
and principal payments using a discount rate equal to the rate of the United
States Treasury securities of comparable remaining maturity plus 35 basis
points.
On March
27, 2008, TEPPCO issued (i) $250.0 million principal amount of 5.90% Senior
Notes due 2013, (ii) $350.0 million principal amount of 6.65% Senior Notes due
2018, and (iii) $400.0 million principal amount of 7.55% Senior Notes due
2038. The senior notes were issued at discounts of $0.2 million, $1.3
million and $2.2 million, respectively, and are being accreted to their face
value over the applicable terms of the senior notes. The senior notes
may be redeemed at any time at TEPPCO’s option with the payment of accrued
interest and a make-whole premium determined by discounting remaining interest
and principal payments using a discount rate equal to the rate of the United
States Treasury securities of comparable remaining maturity plus 50 basis
points.
The
indentures governing TEPPCO’s senior notes contain covenants, including, but not
limited to, covenants limiting the creation of liens securing indebtedness and
sale and leaseback transactions. However, the indentures do not limit
TEPPCO’s ability to incur additional indebtedness. At September 30,
2008, TEPPCO was in compliance with the covenants of its senior
notes.
Junior
Subordinated Notes
In May 2007, TEPPCO issued and sold
$300.0 million in principal amount of fixed/floating, unsecured, long-term
subordinated notes due June 1, 2067 (“Junior Subordinated
Notes”). TEPPCO’s payment obligations under the Junior Subordinated
Notes are subordinated to all of its current and future senior indebtedness (as
defined in the related indenture). The Subsidiary Guarantors have
issued full, unconditional, and joint and several guarantees, on a junior
subordinated basis, of payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and
interest on the Junior Subordinated Notes.
The indenture governing the Junior
Subordinated Notes does not limit TEPPCO’s ability to incur additional debt,
including debt that ranks senior to or equally with the Junior Subordinated
Notes. The indenture allows TEPPCO to defer interest payments on one
or more occasions for up to ten consecutive years, subject to certain
conditions. The indenture also provides that during any period in
which TEPPCO defers interest payments on the Junior Subordinated Notes, subject
to certain exceptions, (i) TEPPCO cannot declare or make any distributions with
respect to, or redeem, purchase or make a liquidation payment with respect to,
any of its equity securities; (ii) neither TEPPCO nor the Subsidiary Guarantors
will make, and TEPPCO and the Subsidiary Guarantors will cause its respective
majority-owned subsidiaries not to make, any payment of interest, principal or
premium, if any, on or repay, purchase or redeem any of TEPPCO’s or the
Subsidiary Guarantors’ debt securities (including securities similar to the
Junior Subordinated Notes) that contractually rank equally with or junior to the
Junior Subordinated Notes or the guarantees, as applicable; and (iii) neither
TEPPCO nor the Subsidiary Guarantors will make, and TEPPCO and the Subsidiary
Guarantors will cause their respective majority-owned subsidiaries not to make,
any payments under a guarantee of debt securities (including under a guarantee
of debt securities that are similar to the Junior Subordinated Notes) that
contractually ranks equally with or junior to the Junior Subordinated Notes or
the guarantees, as applicable.
The Junior Subordinated Notes bear
interest at a fixed annual rate of 7.000% from May 2007 to June 1, 2017, payable
semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing
December 1, 2007. After June 1, 2017, the Junior Subordinated Notes
will bear interest at a variable annual rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR rate for
the related interest period plus 2.7775%, payable quarterly in arrears on March
1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 of each year commencing September 1,
2017. Interest payments may be deferred on a cumulative basis for up
to ten consecutive years, subject to certain provisions. Deferred
interest will accumulate additional interest at the then-prevailing interest
rate on the Junior Subordinated Notes. The Junior Subordinated Notes
mature
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
in June
2067. The Junior Subordinated Notes are redeemable in whole or in
part prior to June 1, 2017 for a “make-whole” redemption price and thereafter at
a redemption price equal to 100% of their principal amount plus accrued
interest. The Junior Subordinated Notes are also redeemable prior to
June 1, 2017 in whole (but not in part) upon the occurrence of certain tax or
rating agency events at specified redemption prices. At September 30,
2008, TEPPCO was in compliance with the covenants of the Junior Subordinated
Notes.
In
connection with the issuance of the Junior Subordinated Notes, TEPPCO and its
Subsidiary Guarantors entered into a replacement capital covenant in favor of
holders of a designated series of senior long-term indebtedness (as provided in
the underlying documents) pursuant to which TEPPCO and its Subsidiary Guarantors
agreed for the benefit of such debt holders that TEPPCO would not redeem or
repurchase or otherwise satisfy, discharge or defease any of the Junior
Subordinated Notes on or before June 1, 2037, unless, subject to certain
limitations, during the 180 days prior to the date of that redemption,
repurchase, defeasance or purchase, TEPPCO has or one of its subsidiaries has
received a specified amount of proceeds from the sale of qualifying securities
that have characteristics that are the same as, or more equity-like than, the
applicable characteristics of the Junior Subordinated Notes. The
replacement capital covenant is not a term of the indenture or the Junior
Subordinated Notes.
Term
Credit Agreement
TEPPCO had in place a senior unsecured
term credit agreement (“Term Credit Agreement”), with a borrowing capacity of
$1.0 billion and a maturity date of December 19, 2008. During the
first quarter of 2008, TEPPCO borrowed $1.0 billion under the Term Credit
Agreement to finance the retirement of TE Products’ senior notes and the Cenac
and Horizon acquisitions and for other partnership purposes. In March
2008, TEPPCO repaid the outstanding balance of the Term Credit Agreement with
proceeds from the issuance of senior notes and other cash on hand and terminated
the agreement.
Debt
Obligations of Unconsolidated Affiliates
We have
one unconsolidated affiliate, Centennial, with long-term debt
obligations. The following table shows the total debt of Centennial
at September 30, 2008 (on a 100% basis) and the corresponding scheduled
maturities of such debt.
|
|
Scheduled
Maturities of Debt
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
2,550 |
|
2009
|
|
|
9,900 |
|
2010
|
|
|
9,100 |
|
2011
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
2012
|
|
|
8,900 |
|
After
2012
|
|
|
93,000 |
|
Total
scheduled maturities of
debt
|
|
$ |
132,450 |
|
At September 30, 2008, Centennial’s
debt obligations consisted of $132.5 million borrowed under a master shelf loan
agreement. Borrowings under the master shelf agreement mature in May
2024 and are collateralized by substantially all of Centennial’s assets and
severally guaranteed by Centennial’s owners. In January 2008, TEPPCO
entered into an amended and restated guaranty agreement (“Amended Guaranty”) in
which TEPPCO, TCTM, TEPPCO Midstream and TE Products (collectively, “TEPPCO
Guarantors”) are required, on a joint and several basis, to pay 50% of any
past-due amount under Centennial’s master shelf loan agreement not paid by
Centennial (see Note 16).
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
NOTE
12. MINORITY INTEREST
Minority interest represents
third-party ownership interests, including those of TEPPCO’s public unitholders,
in the net assets of TEPPCO through TEPPCO’s publicly traded
Units. The Parent Company owns a 2% general partner interest in
TEPPCO and the associated incentive distribution rights of
TEPPCO. For financial reporting purposes, the assets and liabilities
of TEPPCO are consolidated with those of our own, with any third party
investor’s interest in our consolidated balance sheet amounts shown as minority
interest. Distributions to and contributions from minority interests
represent cash payments and cash contributions, respectively. At
September 30, 2008, TEPPCO had outstanding 104,524,501 Units.
Equity
Offerings and Registration Statements
In September 2008, TEPPCO filed a
universal shelf registration statement with the SEC that allows it to issue an
unlimited amount of debt and equity securities and removed from registration
securities remaining under its previous universal shelf registration
statement.
On
September 9, 2008, TEPPCO issued and sold in an underwritten public offering 9.2
million of its Units at a price to the public of $29.00 per Unit, including 1.2
million Units sold upon exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option
granted in connection with the offering. The proceeds from the
offering, net of underwriting discount and offering expenses, totaled
approximately $257.0 million. Concurrently with this offering, TEPPCO
sold 241,380 unregistered Units at the public offering price of $29.00 to the
Employee Partnership, an affiliate of EPCO in which certain EPCO employees who
perform services for us, including the executive officers named in the Executive
Compensation section of TEPPCO’s recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, were issued
Class B limited partner interests to incentivize them to enhance the long-term
value of TEPPCO’s Units. The net proceeds from the offering and the
unregistered issuance to the Employee Partnership were used to reduce
indebtedness under TEPPCO’s Revolving Credit Facility. For additional
information regarding the Employee Partnership and the equity-based compensatory
awards issued therein, please see Note 3.
EPCO,
Inc. TPP Employee Unit Purchase Plan
The EPCO,
Inc. TPP Employee Unit Purchase Plan (the “Unit Purchase Plan”) provides for
discounted purchases of TEPPCO Units by employees of EPCO and its
affiliates. A maximum of 1,000,000 of TEPPCO’s Units may be delivered
under the Unit Purchase Plan (subject to adjustment as provided in the
plan). The Unit Purchase Plan is effective until December 8, 2016,
or, if earlier, at the time that all available TEPPCO Units under the plan have
been purchased on behalf of the participants or the time of termination of the
plan by EPCO or the Chairman or Vice Chairman of EPCO. As of
September 30, 2008, 21,009 TEPPCO Units have been issued to employees under this
plan.
Distribution
Reinvestment Plan
TEPPCO’s distribution reinvestment plan
(“DRIP”) provides for the issuance of up to 10,000,000 of TEPPCO’s
Units. TEPPCO Units purchased through the DRIP may be acquired at a
discount rating from 0% to 5% (currently set at 5%), which will be set from time
to time by TEPPCO. As of September 30, 2008, 245,084 TEPPCO Units
have been issued in connection with the DRIP.
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
NOTE
13. MEMBER’S EQUITY (DEFICIT)
At
September 30, 2008, member’s equity (deficit) consisted of our capital account
and accumulated other comprehensive loss.
At
September 30, 2008, we had a deficit balance of $100.7 million in our member’s
equity account. This negative balance does not represent an asset to
us and does not represent obligations of our member to contribute cash or other
property to us. The member’s equity account generally consists of our
member’s cumulative share of our net income less cash distributions made to it
plus capital contributions that it has made to us. Cash distributions
that we receive during a period from TEPPCO may exceed TEPPCO’s net income for
the period. In turn, cash distributions we make to our member during
a period may exceed our net income for the period. TEPPCO makes
quarterly cash distributions of all of its Available Cash, generally defined as
consolidated cash receipts less consolidated cash disbursements and cash
reserves established by us, as general partner, in our reasonable discretion
(these cash distributions paid to us are eliminated upon consolidation of the
Parent Company’s financial statements with TEPPCO’s financial
statements). Cash distributions by us to our member in excess of our
net income during previous periods resulted in a deficit in the member’s equity
account at September 30, 2008. Future cash distributions that exceed
net income will result in an increase in the deficit balance in the member’s
equity account.
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
SFAS No.
130, Reporting Comprehensive
Income requires certain items such as foreign currency translation
adjustments, gains or losses associated with pension or other postretirement
benefits, prior service costs or credits associated with pension or other
postretirement benefits, transition assets or obligations associated with
pension or other postretirement benefits and unrealized gains and losses on
certain investments in debt and equity securities to be reported in a financial
statement. As of September 30, 2008, the components of accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) reflected on our consolidated balance sheet
were composed of crude oil hedges and treasury locks. The majority of
these crude oil hedges have forward positions that expire during 2008, with the
remainder expiring during 2009. While the crude oil hedges are in
effect, changes in their fair values, to the extent the hedges are effective,
are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until they are
recognized in net income in future periods upon the contract
expiration. The amounts related to settlements of treasury lock
agreements are being amortized into earnings over the terms of the respective
debt (see Note 5).
The
accumulated balance of other comprehensive income (loss) is as
follows:
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
|
$ |
(42,557 |
) |
Changes
in fair values of crude oil cash flow hedges
|
|
|
15,466 |
|
Settlement of treasury
locks
|
|
|
(52,098 |
) |
Amortization of treasury lock
proceeds into earnings
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
Changes in fair values of treasury
locks
|
|
|
25,296 |
|
Ineffectiveness
of treasury locks
|
|
|
42 |
|
Transfer
portion of interest payment hedged under treasury locks
|
|
|
|
|
not
occurring as forecasted to earnings
|
|
|
3,586 |
|
Balance
at September 30, 2008
|
|
$ |
(50,345 |
) |
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
NOTE
14. BUSINESS SEGMENTS
We have
four reporting segments:
§
|
Our
Downstream Segment, which is engaged in the pipeline transportation,
marketing and storage of refined products, LPGs and
petrochemicals;
|
§
|
Our
Upstream Segment, which is engaged in the gathering, pipeline
transportation, marketing and storage of crude oil and distribution of
lubrication oils and specialty
chemicals;
|
§
|
Our
Midstream Segment, which is engaged in the gathering of natural gas,
fractionation of NGLs and pipeline transportation of NGLs;
and
|
§
|
Our
Marine Services Segment, which is engaged in the marine transportation of
refined products, crude oil, condensate, asphalt, heavy fuel oil and other
heated oil products via tow boats and tank
barges.
|
Amounts
indicated below as “Other” include the elimination of intersegment related party
receivables and investment balances among our reporting segments and assets that
we hold that have not been allocated to any of our reporting segments (including
such items as corporate furniture and fixtures, vehicles, computer hardware and
software, prepaid insurance and unamortized debt issuance costs on debt issued
at the TEPPCO level).
|
|
Downstream
Segment
|
|
|
Upstream
Segment
|
|
|
Midstream
Segment
|
|
|
Marine
Services Segment
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
Segment
assets
|
|
$ |
1,289,196 |
|
|
$ |
2,527,885 |
|
|
$ |
1,516,569 |
|
|
$ |
636,508 |
|
|
$ |
15,476 |
|
|
$ |
5,985,634 |
|
Investments
in unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
64,888 |
|
|
|
196,173 |
|
|
|
921,219 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
9,097 |
|
|
|
1,191,377 |
|
Intangible
assets
|
|
|
5,197 |
|
|
|
8,271 |
|
|
|
136,270 |
|
|
|
64,632 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
214,370 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
14,771 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
90,294 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
106,404 |
|
NOTE
15. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The
following table summarizes the related party balances at September 30,
2008:
|
|
September
30,
2008
|
|
Accounts
receivable, related parties
(1)
|
|
$ |
6,410 |
|
Accounts
payable, related parties
(2)
|
|
|
38,940 |
|
________________________________________________
(1)
|
Relates
to sales and transportation services provided to Enterprise Products
Partners and certain of its subsidiaries and EPCO and certain of its
affiliates and direct payroll, payroll related costs and other operational
expenses charged to unconsolidated
affiliates.
|
(2)
|
Relates
to direct payroll, payroll related costs and other operational related
charges from Enterprise Products Partners and certain of its subsidiaries,
EPCO and certain of its affiliates and Cenac and affiliates, and
transportation and other services provided by unconsolidated affiliates
and advances from Seaway for operating
expenses.
|
We are affiliated with EPCO and other
companies controlled by Mr. Duncan, and our transactions and agreements with
them are not necessarily on an arm’s length basis. As a result, we
cannot provide assurance that the terms and provisions of such transactions or
agreements are at least as favorable to us as we could have obtained from
unaffiliated third parties.
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
Relationship
with EPCO and Affiliates
We have
an extensive and ongoing relationship with EPCO and its affiliates, which
include the following significant entities:
§
|
EPCO
and its consolidated private company
subsidiaries;
|
§
|
Enterprise
GP Holdings, which owns and controls all our membership
interests;
|
§
|
Enterprise
Products Partners, which is controlled by affiliates of EPCO, including
Enterprise GP Holdings;
|
§
|
Duncan
Energy Partners, which is controlled by affiliates of
EPCO;
|
§
|
Enterprise
Gas Processing LLC, which is controlled by affiliates of EPCO and is our
joint venture partner in Jonah;
|
§
|
Enterprise
Offshore Port System, LLC, which is controlled by affiliates of EPCO and
is one of our joint venture partners in Texas Offshore Port System;
and
|
§
|
the
Employee Partnership (see Note 3).
|
Dan L.
Duncan directly owns and controls EPCO and, through Dan Duncan LLC, owns and
controls EPE Holdings, LLC, the general partner of Enterprise GP
Holdings. Enterprise GP Holdings owns all of our membership
interests. Our principal business activity is to act as the managing
partner of TEPPCO. Our executive officers are employees of EPCO (see
Note 1).
We and
TEPPCO are both separate legal entities apart from each other and apart from
EPCO and its other affiliates, with assets and liabilities that are separate
from those of EPCO and its other affiliates. EPCO and its
consolidated private company subsidiaries and affiliates depend on the cash
distributions they receive from the Parent Company and other investments to fund
their operations and to meet their debt obligations. We paid cash
distributions of $39.5 million during the nine months ended September 30,
2008.
The ownership interests in us and the
limited partners interests in TEPPCO that are owned or controlled by EPCO and
certain of its affiliates, other than those interests owned by Dan Duncan LLC
and certain trusts affiliated with Dan L. Duncan, are pledged as security under
the credit facility of an affiliate of EPCO. All of the membership
interests in us and the limited partner interests in TEPPCO that are owned or
controlled by Enterprise GP Holdings are pledged as security under its credit
facility. If Enterprise GP Holdings were to default under its credit
facility, its lender banks could own our Parent Company.
EPCO Administrative Services
Agreement
We do not have any employees, and all
of our management, administrative and operating functions are performed by
employees of EPCO, pursuant to the ASA or by other service
providers. We, TEPPCO, Enterprise Products Partners, Duncan Energy
Partners, Enterprise GP Holdings and the respective general partners are parties
to the ASA. The ACG Committees of each general partner
have approved the ASA.
Under the ASA, we reimburse EPCO for
all costs and expenses it incurs in providing management, administrative and
operating services for us, including compensation of employees (i.e., salaries,
medical benefits and retirement benefits) (see Note 1). Since the
vast majority of such expenses are charged to us on an actual basis (i.e., no
mark-up or subsidy is charged or received by EPCO), we believe that such
expenses are representative of what the amounts would have been on a standalone
basis. With respect to allocated costs, we believe that the
proportional direct allocation method employed by EPCO is reasonable and
reflective of the estimated level of costs we would have incurred on a
standalone basis.
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
Jonah
Joint Venture
Enterprise Products Partners (through
an affiliate) is our joint venture partner in Jonah, the partnership through
which we have owned our interest in the system serving the Jonah and Pinedale
fields. Through September 30, 2008, we have reimbursed Enterprise Products
Partners $303.9 million ($42.3 million in 2008, $152.2 million in 2007 and
$109.4 million in 2006) for our share of the Phase V cost incurred by it
(including its cost of capital incurred prior to the formation of the joint
venture of $1.3 million). At September 30, 2008, we had a payable to
Enterprise Products Partners for costs incurred of $1.3 million (see Note
8). At September 30, 2008, we had a receivable from Jonah of $4.6
million for operating expenses. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, we received distributions from Jonah of $111.6
million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, Jonah paid
distributions of $26.8 million to the affiliate of Enterprise Products Partners
that is our joint venture partner.
TEPPCO has agreed to indemnify
Enterprise Products Partners from any and all losses, claims, demands, suits,
liability, costs and expenses arising out of or related to breaches of our
representations, warranties, or covenants related to the formation of the Jonah
joint venture, Jonah’s ownership or operation of the Jonah-Pinedale system prior
to the effective date of the joint venture, and any environmental activity, or
violation of or liability under environmental laws arising from or related to
the condition of the Jonah-Pinedale system prior to the effective date of the
joint venture. In general, a claim for indemnification cannot be
filed until the losses suffered by Enterprise Products Partners exceed $1.0
million, and the maximum potential amount of future payments under the indemnity
is limited to $100.0 million. However, if certain representations or
warranties are breached, the maximum potential amount of future payments under
the indemnity is capped at $207.6 million. All indemnity payments are
net of insurance recoveries that Enterprise Products Partners may receive from
third-party insurers. TEPPCO carries insurance coverage that may offset any
payments required under the indemnity. TEPPCO does not expect that
these indemnities will have a material adverse effect on its financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
Texas Offshore Port System Joint
Venture
Enterprise Products Partners (through
an affiliate) is one of our joint venture partners in Texas Offshore Port System
(see Note 8). Through September 30, 2008, we have a payable of $2.3
million for our contribution to our investment in Texas Offshore Port System,
which will be paid in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Sale
of Parent Company to Enterprise GP Holdings; Relationship with Energy Transfer
Equity
On May 7, 2007, all of our membership
interests, together with 4,400,000 of TEPPCO’s Units, were sold by DFIGP to
Enterprise GP Holdings, a publicly traded partnership also controlled indirectly
by Dan L. Duncan. As of May 7, 2007, Enterprise GP Holdings
owns and controls our 2% general partner interest in TEPPCO and has the right
(through its 100% ownership in us) to receive the incentive distribution rights
associated with our general partner interest in TEPPCO. Enterprise GP
Holdings, DFIGP and other entities controlled by Mr. Duncan own 16,950,130 of
TEPPCO’s Units.
Concurrently with the acquisition of
the Parent Company, Enterprise GP Holdings acquired non-controlling ownership
interests, accounted for as equity method investments, in Energy Transfer
Equity, L.P. (“Energy Transfer Equity”) and LE GP, LLC, the general partner of
Energy Transfer Equity.
Relationship
with Unconsolidated Affiliates
Our significant related party revenues
and expense transactions with unconsolidated affiliates consist of management,
rental and other revenues, transportation expense related to movements on
Centennial and Seaway and rental expense related to the lease of pipeline
capacity on Centennial. For additional information regarding our
unconsolidated affiliates, see Note 8.
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
See “Jonah Joint Venture” and “Texas Offshore Port System Joint Venture” within
this Note 15 for descriptions of ongoing transactions involving our Jonah and
Texas Offshore Port System joint ventures with Enterprise Products
Partners.
NOTE
16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
In 1991, we were named as a defendant
in a matter styled Jimmy R.
Green, et al. v. Cities Service Refinery, et al. as filed in the 26th
Judicial District Court of Bossier Parish, Louisiana. The plaintiffs
in this matter reside or formerly resided on land that was once the site of a
refinery owned by one of our co-defendants. The former refinery is
located near our Bossier City facility. Plaintiffs have claimed
personal injuries and property damage arising from alleged contamination of the
refinery property. The plaintiffs have pursued certification as a
class and have significantly increased their demand to approximately $175.0
million. We have never owned any interest in the refinery property made the
basis of this action, and we do not believe that we contributed to any alleged
contamination of this property. While we cannot predict the ultimate
outcome, we do not believe that the outcome of this lawsuit will have a material
adverse effect on our financial position.
On September 18, 2006, Peter
Brinckerhoff, a purported unitholder of TEPPCO, filed a complaint in the Court
of Chancery of New Castle County in the State of Delaware, in his individual
capacity, as a putative class action on behalf of TEPPCO’s other unitholders,
and derivatively on TEPPCO’s behalf, concerning proposals made to its
unitholders in its definitive proxy statement filed with the SEC on September
11, 2006 (“Proxy Statement”) and other transactions involving TEPPCO
and Enterprise Products Partners or its affiliates. Mr. Brinckerhoff
filed an amended complaint on July 12, 2007. The amended complaint
names as defendants the Parent Company; our Board of Directors; the Parent
Company’s parent companies, including EPCO; Enterprise Products Partners and
certain of its affiliates and Dan L. Duncan. TEPPCO is named as a
nominal defendant.
The amended complaint alleges, among
other things, that certain of the transactions adopted at a special meeting of
TEPPCO’s unitholders on December 8, 2006, including a reduction of the Parent
Company’s maximum percentage interest in TEPPCO’s distributions in exchange for
TEPPCO Units (the “Issuance Proposal”), were unfair to TEPPCO’s unitholders and
constituted a breach by the defendants of fiduciary duties owed to TEPPCO
unitholders and that the Proxy Statement failed to provide TEPPCO unitholders
with all material facts necessary for them to make an informed decision whether
to vote in favor of or against the proposals. The amended complaint
further alleges that, since Mr. Duncan acquired control of us in 2005, the
defendants, in breach of their fiduciary duties to TEPPCO and its unitholders,
have caused TEPPCO to enter into certain transactions with Enterprise Products
Partners or its affiliates that were unfair to TEPPCO or otherwise unfairly
favored Enterprise Products Partners or its affiliates over
TEPPCO. The amended complaint alleges that such transactions include
the Jonah joint venture entered into by TEPPCO and an Enterprise Products
Partners affiliate in August 2006 (citing the fact that our ACG Committee did
not obtain a fairness opinion from an independent investment banking firm in
approving the transaction), and the sale by TEPPCO to an Enterprise Products
Partners’ affiliate of the Pioneer plant in March 2006. As more fully
described in the Proxy Statement, the ACG Committee recommended the Issuance
Proposal for approval by our Board of Directors. The amended
complaint also alleges that Richard S. Snell, Michael B. Bracy and Murray H.
Hutchison, constituting the three members of the ACG Committee at the time,
cannot be considered independent because of their alleged ownership of
securities in Enterprise Products Partners and its affiliates and/or their
relationships with Mr. Duncan.
The amended complaint seeks relief (i)
awarding damages for profits and special benefits allegedly obtained by
defendants as a result of the alleged wrongdoings in the complaint; (ii)
rescinding all actions taken pursuant to the Proxy vote and (iii) awarding
plaintiff costs of the action, including fees and expenses of his attorneys and
experts.
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
In addition to the proceedings
discussed above, we have been, in the ordinary course of business, a defendant
in various lawsuits and a party to various other legal proceedings, some of
which are covered in whole or in part by insurance. We believe that the outcome
of these other proceedings will not individually or in the aggregate have a
future material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position.
Regulatory
Matters
Our pipelines and other facilities are
subject to multiple environmental obligations and potential liabilities under a
variety of federal, state and local laws and regulations. These include, without
limitation: the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; the Clean Air Act;
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act or the Clean Water Act; the Oil
Pollution Act; and analogous state and local laws and regulations. Such laws and
regulations affect many aspects of our present and future operations, and
generally require us to obtain and comply with a wide variety of environmental
registrations, licenses, permits, inspections and other approvals, with respect
to air emissions, water quality, wastewater discharges, and solid and hazardous
waste management. Failure to comply with these requirements may expose us to
fines, penalties and/or interruptions in our operations that could influence our
results of operations. If an accidental leak, spill or release of hazardous
substances occurs at any facilities that we own, operate or otherwise use, or
where we send materials for treatment or disposal, we could be held jointly and
severally liable for all resulting liabilities, including investigation,
remedial and clean-up costs. Likewise, we could be required to remove or
remediate previously disposed wastes or property contamination, including
groundwater contamination. Any or all of this could materially affect
our results of financial position.
We believe that our operations and
facilities are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and
regulations, and that the cost of compliance with such laws and regulations will
not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial
position. We cannot ensure, however, that existing environmental
regulations will not be revised or that new regulations will not be adopted or
become applicable to us. The clear trend in environmental regulation is to place
more restrictions and limitations on activities that may be perceived to affect
the environment, and thus there can be no assurance as to the amount or timing
of future expenditures for environmental regulation compliance or remediation,
and actual future expenditures may be different from the amounts we currently
anticipate. Revised or additional regulations that result in increased
compliance costs or additional operating restrictions, particularly if those
costs are not fully recoverable from our customers, could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of
operations and cash flows. At September 30, 2008, we had an accrued
liability of $7.1 million related to sites requiring environmental remediation
activities.
In 1999, our Arcadia, Louisiana,
facility and adjacent terminals were directed by the Remediation Services
Division of the LDEQ to pursue remediation of environmental
contamination. Effective March 2004, we executed an access agreement
with an adjacent industrial landowner who is located upgradient of the Arcadia
facility. This agreement enables the landowner to proceed with
remediation activities at our Arcadia facility for which it has accepted shared
responsibility. At September 30, 2008, we have an accrued liability
of $0.6 million for remediation costs at our Arcadia facility. We do
not expect that the completion of the remediation program proposed to the LDEQ
will have a future material adverse effect on our financial
position.
We are in negotiations
with the U.S. Department of Transportation with respect to a notice of probable
violation that we received on April 25, 2005, for alleged violations of pipeline
safety regulations at our Todhunter facility, with a proposed $0.4 million civil
penalty. We responded on June 30, 2005, by admitting certain of the
alleged violations, contesting others and requesting a reduction in the proposed
civil penalty. We do not expect any settlement, fine or penalty to
have a material adverse effect on our financial position.
The FERC, pursuant to the
Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, as amended, the Energy Policy Act of 1992 and
rules and orders promulgated thereunder, regulates the tariff rates for our
interstate common carrier pipeline
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
operations. To
be lawful under that Act, interstate tariff rates, terms and conditions of
service must be just and reasonable and not unduly discriminatory, and must be
on file with the FERC. In addition, pipelines may not confer any
undue preference upon any shipper. Shippers may protest, and the FERC
may investigate, the lawfulness of new or changed tariff rates. The
FERC can suspend those tariff rates for up to seven months. It can
also require refunds of amounts collected with interest pursuant to rates that
are ultimately found to be unlawful. The FERC and interested parties
can also challenge tariff rates that have become final and
effective. Because of the complexity of rate making, the lawfulness
of any rate is never assured. A successful challenge of our rates
could adversely affect our revenues.
The FERC uses prescribed rate
methodologies for approving regulated tariff rates for transporting crude oil
and refined products. Our interstate tariff rates are either
market-based or derived in accordance with the FERC’s indexing methodology,
which currently allows a pipeline to increase its rates by a percentage linked
to the producer price index for finished goods. These methodologies
may limit our ability to set rates based on our actual costs or may delay the
use of rates reflecting increased costs. Changes in the FERC’s
approved methodology for approving rates could adversely affect
us. Adverse decisions by the FERC in approving our regulated rates
could adversely affect our cash flow.
The intrastate liquids pipeline
transportation and gas gathering services we provide are subject to various
state laws and regulations that apply to the rates we charge and the terms and
conditions of the services we offer. Although state regulation
typically is less onerous than FERC regulation, the rates we charge and the
provision of our services may be subject to challenge.
Although our natural gas gathering
systems are generally exempt from FERC regulation under the Natural Gas Act of
1938, FERC regulation still significantly affects our natural gas gathering
business. Our natural gas gathering operations could be adversely
affected in the future should they become subject to the application of federal
regulation of rates and services or if the states in which we operate adopt
policies imposing more onerous regulation on gathering. Additional
rules and legislation pertaining to these matters are considered and adopted
from time to time at both state and federal levels. We cannot predict
what effect, if any, such regulatory changes and legislation might have on our
operations or revenues.
Contractual
Obligations
In March 2008, TEPPCO issued $1.0
billion of senior notes due 2013, 2018 and 2038 (see Note 11). Other
than the issuance of these senior notes, there have been no significant changes
in our schedule of maturities of long-term debt or other contractual obligations
since the year ended December 31, 2007.
The following table summarizes TEPPCO’s
maturities of long-term debt obligations at September 30, 2008:
|
|
Payment
or Settlement due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities
of long-term debt (1)
|
|
$ |
2,324,717 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
824,717 |
|
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
Interest
payments (2)
|
|
$ |
2,692,176 |
|
|
$ |
154,584 |
|
|
$ |
151,173 |
|
|
$ |
151,173 |
|
|
$ |
132,110 |
|
|
$ |
97,761 |
|
|
$ |
2,005,375 |
|
__________________
(1)
|
TEPPCO
has long-term payment obligations under its Revolving Credit Facility, its
senior notes and its Junior Subordinated Notes. Amounts shown
in the table represent our scheduled future maturities of long-term debt
principal for the periods indicated (see Note 11 for additional
information regarding our consolidated debt
obligations).
|
(2)
|
Includes
interest payments due on TEPPCO’s senior notes and junior subordinated
notes and interest payments and commitment fees due on its Revolving
Credit Facility. The interest amount calculated on the
Revolving Credit Facility and the junior subordinated notes is based on
the assumption that the amount outstanding and the interest rate charged
both remain at their current
levels.
|
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
Other
Guarantees
At September 30, 2008, Centennial’s
debt obligations consisted of $132.5 million borrowed under a master shelf loan
agreement. In January 2008, TEPPCO entered into an Amended Guaranty
agreement with Centennial’s lenders, under which the TEPPCO Guarantors are
required, on a joint and several basis, to pay 50% of any past-due amount under
Centennial’s master shelf loan agreement not paid by Centennial. The
Amended Guaranty also has a credit maintenance requirement whereby TEPPCO may be
required to provide additional credit support in the form of a letter of credit
or pay certain fees if either of its credit ratings from Standard & Poor’s
Ratings Group and Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. falls below investment grade
levels as specified in the Amended Guaranty. If Centennial defaults
on its debt obligations, the estimated maximum potential amount of future
payments for the TEPPCO Guarantors and Marathon is $66.2 million each at
September 30, 2008. At September 30, 2008, we have a liability of
$9.1 million, which is based upon the expected present value of the amounts we
would have to pay under the guarantee.
TE Products, Marathon and Centennial
have also entered into a limited cash call agreement, which allows each member
to contribute cash in lieu of Centennial procuring separate insurance in the
event of a third-party liability arising from a catastrophic
event. There is an indefinite term for the agreement and each member
is to contribute cash in proportion to its ownership interest, up to a maximum
of $50.0 million each. As a result of the catastrophic event
guarantee, at September 30, 2008, TE Products has a liability of $3.9 million,
which is based upon present value of amounts we would have to pay under the
guarantee. If a catastrophic event were to occur and we were required
to contribute cash to Centennial, such contributions might be covered by our
insurance (net of deductible), depending upon the nature of the catastrophic
event.
One of our subsidiaries, TCO, has
entered into master equipment lease agreements with finance companies for the
use of various pieces of equipment. Lease expense related to this
equipment is approximately $5.2 million per year. We have guaranteed
the full and timely payment and performance of TCO’s obligations under the
agreements. Generally, events of default would trigger our
performance under the guarantee. The maximum potential amount of
future payments under the guarantee is not estimable, but would include base
rental payments for both current and future equipment, stipulated loss payments
in the event any equipment is stolen, damaged, or destroyed and any future
indemnity payments. We carry insurance coverage that may offset any
payments required under the guarantees. We do not believe that any
performance under the guarantee would have a material effect on our financial
condition.
Motiva Project
In December 2006, we signed an
agreement with Motiva Enterprises, LLC (“Motiva”) for us to construct and
operate a new refined products storage facility to support the expansion of
Motiva’s refinery in Port Arthur, Texas. Under the terms of the
agreement, we are constructing a 5.4 million barrel refined products storage
facility for gasoline and distillates. The agreement also provides
for a 15-year throughput and dedication of volume, which will commence upon
completion of the refinery expansion. The project includes the
construction of 20 storage tanks, five 5.4-mile product pipelines connecting the
storage facility to Motiva’s refinery, 21,000 horsepower of pumping capacity,
and distribution pipeline connections to the Colonial, Explorer and Magtex
pipelines. The storage and pipeline project is expected to be
completed by January 1, 2010. As a part of a separate but
complementary initiative, we are constructing an 11-mile, 20-inch pipeline to
connect the new storage facility in Port Arthur to our refined products terminal
in Beaumont, Texas, which is the primary origination facility for our mainline
system. These projects will facilitate connections to additional
markets through the Colonial, Explorer and Magtex pipeline systems and provide
the Motiva refinery with access to our pipeline system. The total
cost of the project is expected to be approximately $310.0 million, which
includes $20.0 million for the 11-mile, 20-inch pipeline, $30.0 million of
capitalized interest and $17.0 million of mutually agreed upon scope changes
requested by Motiva. Through September 30, 2008, we have spent
approximately $89.8 million on this construction project.
TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
(Continued)
Under the
terms of the agreement, if Motiva cancels the agreement prior to the
commencement date of the project, Motiva will reimburse us the actual reasonable
expenses we have incurred after the effective date of the agreement, including
both internal and external costs that would be capitalized as a part of the
project, plus a ten percent cancellation fee.
Texas Offshore Port System
We, through a subsidiary, own a
one-third interest in the Texas Offshore Port System joint
venture. The aggregate cost of the TOPS and PACE projects is expected
to be approximately $1.8 billion (excluding capitalized interest), with the
majority of such expenditures occurring in 2009 and 2010. TEPPCO has
guaranteed up to approximately $700.0 million of the capital expenditure
obligations of its subsidiary in the joint venture. See Note 8 for
further information.